Template:Did you know nominations/Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
I am not sure which hook is better ("hookier"). The first one does not reveal a lot and thus entices the reader to click on the link, but the second one contains two big names and a photograph. Perhaps we could use the first one if the article is promoted without the image and the second one if the image is deemed good enough? [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 11:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] My pick goes to the original hook. All criteria met; long enough, new enough, no copyvio and QPQ done. ☯ [[User:Bonkers The Clown|<font colorspan style= "Jade"color:lime; face="font-family:Arial;">'''Bonkers''' ''The Clown''</fontspan>]] '''\(^_^)/''' '''[[User talk:Bonkers The Clown| Nonsensical Babble]]''' ☯ 04:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
**Thanks for the quick review! The hook should probably be featured as soon as possible - the baby may come any day now. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 10:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. I have suggested on article's talk page that the article is moved to ''Unborn child'' of..., as I don't think it's right to call it ''child of'' yet. Regards, [[User:Iselilja|Iselilja]] ([[User talk:Iselilja|talk]]) 11:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Navigation menu