This editor is a Veteran Editor.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:SportsFan007

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to my Wikipedia User Talk Page!!!

NOTE - To request a userbox: Click Here

Editing others comments[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Basketball Association, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 16:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

@Yosemiter: Understood, thank you!!! SportsFan007 (talk) 16:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Per your comment about someone else's comment on your previous edit warring: in my opinion, you have become a much better editor now than your were then. You went through some growing pains and unfortunately it is in your block history. Keep up the good work otherwise and keep learning even if you make mistakes. (This template was more of an FYI than an actual warning.) Yosemiter (talk) 16:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

SBS[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I have seen you reverted my edit. What is the need for the recent change in the amount operated section? Seems to always been ok the way it was before 24.104.250.197 (talk) 00:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

@24.104.250.197: I wanted to keep it consistent with the other tables. SportsFan007 (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

@SportsFan007: I see, however there is no way to have complete consistency considering the fact that there is no exact numbers provided as there are for the local and express fleets. Have said that, I would suggest putting it back to the old way it was. 24.104.250.197 (talk) 00:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

@24.104.250.197: Ok, i switched it back until the numbers can be obtained. Thank you!!!! SportsFan007 (talk) 00:43, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

@SportsFan007: No problem, I am glad I could be of some help. 24.104.250.197 (talk) 02:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

December 2018[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

I noticed your recent edit to Minnesota United FC does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. And on the fields article Stop adding BS to articles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for adding an unprompted edit summary on the stadiums article. While the 2018 season is over, the field has not been opened and so to state it's in-use is misleading at best and a lie a worst. We do not make statements on the project until they actually take place. This applies to transfers, starts of contracts and use of fields. Atlanta was the same. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
@Walter Görlitz: Ah ok, fair enough, thank you!!! SportsFan007 (talk) 01:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

How is it possible for you to like so many pairs of rival teams without breaking under pressure?[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

See title. InvalidOStalk 21:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

@InvalidOS: I'm just a fan of all teams from or affiliated with Nevada and New York. SportsFan007 (talk) 21:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. InvalidOStalk 21:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Greetings, about a user[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hi, SportsFan007, I noticed that you had a lots of requests from a single user to make user-boxes, and I have gotten a lot as well. First, I want to thank you for helping out with some of the requests, your boxes looks great! However, is there something we should do about this? It's not necessarily bad, just repetitive. Thank you for your feedback, and have a nice day! Zanygenius(talk to me!)(email me!) 00:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

@Zanygenius: Perhaps we should put limits on requests per user as to number of requests in certain amount of time? SportsFan007 (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@SportsFan007: Thank you for replying, that is a good idea. In my personal opinion, creativity itself shouldn't be limited. So perhaps we could do like 2-4 requests a week? Also, should we ask the tech about this, and try to get some help that way? Zanygenius(talk to me!)(email me!) 16:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

April 2019[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

As I already wrote to other users, the new logo will not be used until the 2020 season per a press release. In addition, the logo that you reinstated is the league's secondary logo. The new main logo is completely different. Just because something is shown on their website, that does not mean that you or anyone else should ignore what was officially stated in a press release. And regarding the WNBA's "Commissioner" – there is no such position in the WNBA. It is clearly stated in a press release from October 2018 that "Following three successful seasons as President of the Women’s National Basketball Association...", which is clear that President is the top position. In addition, it also says that "NBA Deputy Commissioner Mark Tatum will oversee the WNBA on an interim basis, and a search for a new league president will commence immediately.", which makes Mark Tatum as interim President. Please get familiar with the situation before reverting, because I am getting fed up with these reverts. – Sabbatino (talk) 13:16, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

@Sabbatino: I apologize for my confusion. SportsFan007 (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
@Sabbatino: Also, according to this website: [[1]], the logo that I had reinstated is the main logo. SportsFan007 (talk) 14:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
SportsLogos.net often confuse logos, which is the case with the WNBA's logo. The new main logo is similar to the current one, but the athlete is rotated to the left (in the current logo it is rotated to the right). One of the places where the correct main logo can be seen is at NBA G League's website (top right corner). – Sabbatino (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment. Also, please keep the discussion in one place. – Sabbatino (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
@Sabbatino: Thank you for clarifying. SportsFan007 (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fix Your signature[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I noticed on a talk page your signature causes your username to appear after the timestamp. I suggest you fix it. TheEditster (talk) 19:20, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

@TheEditster: I don’t see what you are talking about. SportsFan007 (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
This. You'll see your username show up right after the timestamp on your signature. I just corrected the latest one. TheEditster (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
@TheEditster: That automatically happens when I use the ~~~~ SportsFan007 (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
That's because you have your username string after the date. You have to go to settings and remove the username string. You have it twice. TheEditster (talk) 00:35, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
@TheEditster: Fixed! Thank you! SportsFan007 (talk) 01:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A beer for you![edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Export hell seidel steiner.png Nice meeting you ~ your welcome ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 23:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

What are your thoughts on merging of duplicate userboxes?[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

After I posted an invitation for the effort to WP:WPUBX#Diffuse, I thought a bunch about another task claimed at the page of the WikiProject Userboxes, namely Merge duplicates of same template. Today, I checked the archive of my talk page, I thought I should ask you about this. In responce to the linked userbox request, you have created three similar userboxes: {{User:SportsFan007/UserBoxes/Pearl Jam}}, {{User:SportsFan007/UserBoxes/Pearl Jam2}}, and {{User:SportsFan007/UserBoxes/Pearl Jam3}}. What do you think about possibly merging them into one userbox with a parameter to allow choosing the wording? —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

@Andrybak: Sounds like a good idea to me. SportsFan007 (talk) 01:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 Done Special:Diff/882155205/903901446 —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Do you have any thoughts about merging of userboxes in general? Is it a worthwhile task? —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You have been turkied! :)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thanksgiving Turkey.jpg
You deserve a special thanks for taking a load off my plate with the user boxes a while ago. has given you a Turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving!

Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Zanygenius(talk to me!)(email me!) 15:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Attribution please![edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello, it has come to my attention that you and a group of other users have copied my "blue button UBX page link" idea. This is okay, but could you please credit me?
Thanks, CrazyMinecart88 (talk | contribs) 12:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

@CrazyMinecart88: I apologize, I honestly thought it was a default Wikipedia template, I didn't realize it was somebody's custom design. How exactly do I credit you? SportsFan007 (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

It is not a custom template, but it was my idea to use it in this way. You don't have to credit me, but it something like this happens again, please tell the user what you are doing. My apologies for any confusion I may have caused you.
Thanks, CrazyMinecart88 (talk | contribs) 16:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Raiders userbox[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The custom for NFL userboxes is for the primary color to be the "color jersey" color, and for the ID color to be the helmet color (wherever it's different).

I don't know why you're so insistent on changing the main Raiders userbox when you can just make a new one with your color preferences? (Heck, I'll make one for you myself if you'd like)? Tom Danson (talk) 20:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

@Tom Danson: I apologize, there was confusion on my part due to being mislead by the Raider's "Silver and Black" nickname. SportsFan007 (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Las Vegas Rampage" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Las Vegas Rampage. Since you had some involvement with the Las Vegas Rampage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Yosemiter (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Also related: WP:RSBREAKING. Please do not add the team until the league actually approves of both the sale and relocation, both are still pending per VGK themselves: "The purchase and relocation is subject to approval from the American Hockey League Board of Governors." as well as other sources. The name you are using is also completely speculative based off trademark filings, most teams file for several just to make sure they have them (both the Seattle NHL team and their AHL affiliate have abut 5 trademarks each at this point, just as a recent example). Yosemiter (talk) 19:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

@Yosemiter: Am I wrong to think that this source: [[2]] says that the deal is approved? SportsFan007 (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Re-read WP:RSBREAKING, even good sources can be wrong when reporting on breaking events. The buyers themselves in their press release: "The purchase and relocation is subject to approval from the American Hockey League Board of Governors" and "Media availability for Golden Knights representatives will be held at a later date following approval of the purchase and relocation from the AHL Board of Governors". So no, the sale is certainly not currently approved even if the approval is just a formality at this point. Things like this have fallen through before for odd reason (failure to get a lease, facilities are not approved by league, other owners vote to block, etc.) Yosemiter (talk) 19:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
@Yosemiter: Ah ok, fair enough, thank you! SportsFan007 (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.