Page extended-protected

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrator instructions

Requests for permissions

This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, template editor rights and AutoWikiBrowser access.

Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 06:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


Handled here

User groups

  • Account creator (add requestview requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
  • Autopatrolled (add requestview requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
  • AutoWikiBrowser (add requestview requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the quick guide on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
  • Confirmed (add requestview requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
  • Event coordinator (add requestview requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
  • Extended confirmed (add requestview requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
  • File mover (add requestview requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
  • Mass message sender (add requestview requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
  • New page reviewer (add requestview requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
  • Page mover (add requestview requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
  • Pending changes reviewer (add requestview requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
  • Rollback (add requestview requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
  • Template editor (add requestview requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

Handled elsewhere

Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

Removal of permissions

If you wish to have any of your permission flags (except administrator) removed, you should contact an administrator. If you want your administrator flag removed, you should contact a bureaucrat.

This is not the place to request review of another user's rights. If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission flag, you should raise your concern at the incidents noticeboard.

The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight flags are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.



To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

Any editor may comment on requests for permission.


Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

Current requests

Account creator



I have made more than 25 new articles, and I believe that my articles (especially my recent ones) are clean enough. My articles and my adherence to the Wikipedia guidelines used to be bad when I first joined, but now I think I meet guidelines well enough to be considered for autopatrolled. Roniius (talk) 03:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Nice work. Suggest you read up on the use of endashes, though. Schwede66 17:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)



Adding sidebars to numerous articles (Template:California_state_agencies and Template:California law) — Amitabho Chattopadhyay talk 19:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has approximately 488 non-automated edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 01:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I often find myself sprucing up pages, finding common errors when I do. Being able to automate this process would be a real timesaver. Plandu (talk) 04:48, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has AutoWikiBrowser access. MusikBot talk 04:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Novem Linguae

I'd like to use this tool to add template navboxes to articles more easily. For example, User:Novem Linguae/Drafts/Template:Software testing or Template:Iranian Intermezzo (a recent AFC accept of mine). I'll be careful not to make invisible edits or do anything controversial. Thank you for your consideration. –Novem Linguae (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Trusted user, easily qualifies. ♠PMC(talk) 00:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


The specific impetus for this request is tagging categories for Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 12#Category:Wikipedians by ancestry (since the bot that usually does CfD tags for mass nominations is broken right now). While I could of course request someone else do that specific task, I tend to do things like that periodically (both other deletion nominations and unrelated mass editing tasks), and meet the requirements for AWB with 4,000 non-automated mainspace edits, so I figured I should ask for the rights myself. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Trusted user, easily qualifies. ♠PMC(talk) 00:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


Event coordinator


I am an experienced user and will be jointly facilitating this editathon tomorrow: Wikipedia:GLAM/Australian_libraries_and_WP/Events/City_of_Sydney_Picture_This. I expect to be a part of three editathons this year, and usually run at least one per year, so ideally would prefer this right not to be time-limited. 99of9 (talk) 07:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user was granted temporary event coordinator rights by Xaosflux (expires 09:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 09:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done added for this event as this appears time sensitive. Please post another request when you know which other events you may be doing. — xaosflux Talk 09:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Extended confirmed


I would like to request extendedconfirmed rights for Golollop, which I created pursuant to WP:PUBSOCK. Thank you. – Sdrqaz (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Mz7 (talk) 04:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

File mover

User:Girl Mystique

I would want to be a file mover. Just to let you know I have experienced uploading a file, and as a extended auto confirmed user with 843 edits. Thank you. Black Canary (talk) 22:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Not done – You have no experience with moving files. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Mass message sender


I am the Secretary of the Affiliations Committee and we are preparing for the first of our new member elections of 2021. We need to post announcements to all Affiliates about this election and invite interested parties to consider serving on AffCom. There are other needs that arise for communicating across all Affiliates, and we need the internal capacity to do this. Thank you. FULBERT (talk) 17:47, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer


Hi! I'm Dswitz10734, an extended confirmed editor here. I've wanted to become a reviewer for a while now, so I decided to put in a request. I have 430 mainspace edits to a variety of different topics. I want to become a reviewer because I want to help develop new pages so they can help give free information to the everyone. I've started a few pages here, such as Thrawn: Alliances and Star Wars Battlefront II: Inferno Squad. I would appreciate a month-long trial period to get used to this role. Thank you for your time and I hope to hear from you soon! Dswitz10734 (talk) 13:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 13:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 430 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 13:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 430 mainspace edits, you don't meet the minimum requirements for granting. Please come back when you have the experience required for administrators to review your edits. — JJMC89(T·C) 08:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I had this perm years ago, and when Xaosflux (talk) removed it he said to stop by here if I need it again. Lately I've been doing some patrolling of a specific RC filter I use to keep an eye out for a few sockmasters, but which incidentally brings me in contact with a lot of newly-created userspace pages. In light of that, I thought I might be able to be of greater help if I can mark said pages as patrolled while I'm at it, even if userspace patrolling isn't the main focus of NPP. If that's not a good enough reason, that's fine. I might get back to more active NPP work in the future, and if so, would request again then. -- Tamzin (they/she) | o toki tawa mi. 08:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
There's really no need to patrol userspace pages, so Not done on that basis. That having been said, I don't see any immediate issues with your prior track record, so I'd be happy to confer the permission if you want to patrol new articles in mainspace. signed, Rosguill talk 23:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Fair enough. Face-smile.svg I'll let you know if I decide to get back into NPP work. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 23:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:A.A Prinon

Hello! I have been using Wikipedia for four months and have made more than 1300 live edits including more than 500 live mainspace edits. Which includes creation of 20 articles, with none being deleted. I am also active in participating in AfD discussions or nominating for AfD or PROD. I recently have also become a probationary AfC reviewer and enjoying by helping with AfC. So, as I probably meet all the criteria, I thought that I would just help as NPR or reviewing new articles. Thanks!  A.A Prinon  Conversation 16:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Page mover


Want to be able to move over redirects. I've been carrying out RM closes for a while now without controversy. FOARP (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
As an example of the kind of RM discussions I'd like to be able to close - Talk:Evgeniya_Kanayeva#Requested_move_28_April_2021. FOARP (talk) 08:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Clear experience with closing move requests, can't see any issues that give me pause. ♠PMC(talk) 00:15, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


This permission will allow me to complete the closure of RMs that I now need to request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Vpab15 (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)


I have 76,000+ edits and created approximately 80 articles. As both NP Patroller and AfC reviewer I would like the permission so that I can move reasonable drafts out of sandboxes to the 'preferred location'. At the moment, I quite often receive messages and/or credit/blame for items I have not created. When moving a sandbox draft a redirect is left which the 'owner' of the userpage overwrites with a new item but I am 'shown' as the first editor of the page. It would also be useful when moving new pages out of mainspace into draft which also creates a redirect which then has to be deleted by an Administrator. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 20:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 20:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Obvious need, no evident issues. ♠PMC(talk) 00:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


In the past (about a year ago) I had the page mover right. Several months ago, I began a adopting program. My adopter, MarioJump83, recommended that I get that rollback/page mover back. I am requesting this right as part of the adopting. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
@L235: as revoking admin. You should probably address why the rights were revoked to begin with if you want them re-instated. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
I made some very unwise suppressredirect page moves. L235 emphasized my move of Tropical Depression Ambo (2020) to Tropical Storm Ambo (2020) which, in L235's words, wasn't even close to a suppressable redirect. The straw that broke the camel's back was violating WP:EWLO to vandalize Egg drop syndrome. I would never do any of that again, and if I am granted the right, I will carefully review Wikipedia:Page mover before making any moves. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Yeah. But I don't think you're ready for this user right yet. As your mentor here, if you want to become a page mover you should be highly trusted and can make right administrative decisions. This is obviously not the case for now, unfortunately. @Chicdat: consider going for PCR first, then autopatrolled, if you want to have an advanced user permissions. MarioJump83! 03:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
It's more likely I'd get indefinitely blocked than get this right. I withdraw. Chicdat (bawk to me) 10:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn (for the bot). Primefac (talk) 16:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I was granted temporary PMR by Anarchyte as a two-month trial in mid-March and am requesting extension. My move log show a number of unproblematic RM closes and RM/TR requests, as well as some reversion of pagemove vandalism. I have had one move in that period requested to be relisted by a party to the RM; I did so promptly and the discussion was re-closed a week later with an upholding of my original close. Vaticidalprophet 20:14, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Anarchyte (expires 00:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done I believe the issues noted by Anarchyte in assigning the temporary permission have been dealt with, no further issues (and Anarchyte has edited since this was posted and hasn't objected). ♠PMC(talk) 00:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


I would like to be able to move over redirects as I often would like to move pages for disambiguation purposes/move drafts into the mainspace but I am not able to do this as sometimes there are redirects in the way. In terms of experience, I don't have an immense amount of edits (coming up to 6,000) but I have been editing for a year now and have created quite a few pages and performed many page moves. APD (hmu) 17:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer


I'm very active on English Wikipedia and I'm familiar with wikipedia policy's on vandalism, Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. Like all of you, my first goal is to make Wikipedia, a more better place. Nitesh003 (talk) 03:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Sorry, but it looks like you are still relatively new here; most of the messages on your user talk page are notices about potential issues with your editing. Please feel free to request this right again in the future after you gain more experience. Mz7 (talk) 04:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I'm requesting to become a pending changes reviewer because I want to help clearing out the backlog of pending changes when needed to. I've read Reviewing pending changes thoroughly. kpgamingz (rant me) 23:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 23:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Mz7 (talk) 04:22, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I've had WP:ROLLBACK for a bit now, and I'd like to start making some more consequential and helpful edits, as well as reviewing pending changes. I'm fairly active, although I'm going to start editing a lot more in a couple weeks once the summer starts. I've done my research and I believe that I would make a great reviewer. Catalyzzt (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Mz7 (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


Think I'm fairly active on Wikipedia. I have been WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED for a while now. I'm familiar with the policies and I think I can help. ☎️ Churot DancePop 11:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done Mz7 (talk) 04:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I've been editing WP for a fair while now, at least a couple hours each day, and I'm familiar with the policies on vandalism, NPOV, RS, and I'd like to be able to help out on the articles on my watchlist that have pending changes enabled. Loafiewa (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC) Loafiewa (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Mz7 (talk) 04:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I have an experience with creating articles and have created 27 articles Aliaboomar (talk) 13:16, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

User:DFW FAA Brianvators

Hi, the reason why I am requesting a pending change reviewer because I’ve experienced Wikipedia for about 3 months now. However, I’ve read the policies and states that I can only accept edits that are constructive and have cited the sources. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


I would like to expand my maintenance work to include reviewing pending changes. Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 02:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 Done Mz7 (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Justus Nussbaum

I'm fairly active on English Wikipedia. And of course I'm familiar with the policies. Just N. (talk) 13:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)


I've had rollback for some time and I'm familiar with the important policies like biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research and What Wikipedia is not. I'm requesting pending changes reviewer because I want to help clearing the pending changes backlog. Morneo06 (talk) 09:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


I have been fighting vandalism here for a while, I would like to contribute as a pending changes reviewer as well. Thank you! QuantumRealm (meowpawtrack) 06:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I'm requesting to become a pending changes reviewer as an active Wikipedian and like to expand my work. I thoroughly know the policies on vandalism and I have created more than 1200 article since Four and a half years. Pinakpani (talk) 15:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


User:Jogesh 69

I am requesting for roll back because, I hate vandalism. Even I had done it when I was new and didn't knew much about Wikipedia policies, but it's ok now. I also wanted to join CVU but can't as the teacher had gone nowhere when it comes to teaching Jogesh 69 (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Hello Jogesh 69, I appreciate that you hate vandalism and is ready to fight it. But do you have any past experience dealing with it? As of now, a quick look at your editing history does not give me the impression that you have any past experience fighting it. You need to show here, why you deserves the right. I hope you understood the point. Regards. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 18:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 12:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Not done Insufficient experience. Anarchyte (talkwork) 12:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


One month ago, I had a request declined for rollback [3] due to edit warring and Mz7 told me to request rollback again after one month with no edit warring. Now, it has been one month since the decline in which I have not edit warred, and so I am coming back to request again. I am requesting rollback because I have been reverting vandalism with RedWarn and Twinkle so far, but it's not very convenient since I have to click on a diff to revert vandalism. I would like an easier and faster way to revert vandals. I completely understand if you think one month wasn't enough time; I am happy to wait as long as you would like. Thank you. ~ 🌀HurricaneCovid🌀 14:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 14:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Facepalm DXLB and LokiBlaster 16:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
? ~ 🌀HurricaneCovid🌀 17:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
DXLB Muzikant, please refrain from commenting on others' permissions requests unless you have something useful and constructive to add. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

User:A.A Prinon

I am requesting for rollbacker rights as it will be easier for me to revert vandalism. I think I meet all the criteria. I have more than 200 mainspace edits including 15 article creations. I am also a bit used to reverting vandal or inappropriate edits. And I have never been warned for edit warring or disruptive editing. Hope to get quick response from ToBeFree.  A.A Prinon  Conversation 11:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

User:DFW FAA Brianvators

I’m requesting it for a rollback is because I have used twinkle feature for a month now. I just wanted try out the full rollback features on Wikipedia. I can revert the edits that are non constructive at all, not providing a reliable sources, and obviously the bad faith edits. However, I must do my rollback job correctly otherwise my rollback rights will be revoked. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 05:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 05:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


I've been reverting vandalism (although a bit sporadically) for a while now using Twinkle and would like to be able to take care of it much faster using Huggle. I believe I'm fairly experienced as a Wikipedian and meet the requirements for this permission. Thank you for your time! Bsoyka🗣️ 04:23, 4 May 2021 (UTC)


I would like to get rollback and use it for Huggle. I already do a fair bit of counter vandalism with Twinkle. I fully understand the relevant policies. NW1223 | Howl at me 14:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 15:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn NW1223 | Howl at me 20:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Blaze The Wolf

I have been dealing with vandalism and while Twinkle's rollback works just fine, rollback rights are required for some more advanced anti-vandalism tools which I'm wanting to get into. Usually if I'm not completely sure on whether an edit is vandalism or not I ask people in the Discord or just leave it for someone else to deal with. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)


I have been a pending changes reviewer for a while now; recently got back onto Wikipedia after an hiatus of a few months, and have continued working to revert vandalism. I've been working against vandalism for a good bit, and the rollback permissions would enable me to do this with much greater efficiency. Stickymatch 23:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)


I sometimes patrol recent changes for vandalism and always keep an eye on vandalism for pages on my watchlist, often using Twinkle for the same. I believe that I can help fight vandalism even better with these user rights. KyloRen3 (talk) 10:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC) KyloRen3 (talk) 10:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


Hi! I've been reverting vandalism on Wikipedia for a little under a year now (albeit with a 4-month wikibreak), and I recently completed WP:CVUA through Cassiopeia (see here). I'd like rollback rights to continue this effort, especially by using Huggle. Thanks in advance for your consideration! Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 12:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment: I confirmed Pupserlove02 is one of my CVUA student who recently graduated the program which you can find it here. Cassiopeia(talk) 02:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you both very much for doing this.
 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


I am a user of Wikipedia in Spanish. There I am a rollback and self-confirmed. I create articles by translating them, and I fix minor errors, patrol new pages, and combat vandalism. The same thing that I do in eswiki I also want to do it here. I think my contributions to the English Wikipedia would go up if they give me the flag. Villalaso (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 34 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 18:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Not done Different Wikipedias have different standards and policies. I'm not denigrating your contribs at all, but with only 34 mainspace contributions to, I don't have the confidence that you're familiar enough with how things are done here to assign rollback. ♠PMC(talk) 00:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


I want to contain the rollback rights because I've been reverting and experiencing vandalism throughout Wikipedia like in my talk page and in Special:RecentChanges. I have read Wikipedia:Rollback thoroughly and know when to rollback and not. kpgamingz (rant me) 12:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 12:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Laser Victor 2017

I mostly edit Football related pages, especially Indian and Asian Football. I'm requesting the Rollback permission to reduce vandalism, which I generally do with the help of WP:Twinkle. Having this permission will help me counter vandalism with more flexibility. Laser Victor 2017 ❯❯❯ talk 12:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


I've been using Twinkle to revert vandalism since late February 2021, I believe. I'd like to gain rollback rights to deal with vandalism more quickly. A significant amount of my recent edits are made up of vandalism revision using the recent changes page, as I am unable to use Huggle. I feel I've read through Wikipedia:Rollback enough to understand how to properly use it. SleepForever (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


Hello, I am a aspiring editor doing CV a lot. I got denied a few months ago because I just started doing CV though they also said if I keep this up I might be able to get rollback rights. After a wikibreak and trip to the wikipedia hospital to cure my wikipedia addiction for the near future, I have done more CV, and teahouse question answering. In fact, a editor thanked me for my CV edits. Redwarn and twinkle are my best pals. I hope you accept. TigerScientist Chat 16:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
It was me who had declined that request (Special:PermanentLink/995102821#User:TigerScientist), and my concerns are mostly resolved. I'm still a bit afraid that you're doing too much, too early, too fast. Please use this permission carefully and pause its usage before you need a wikibreak.
 Done with hesitation. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


Hello there. I made over 18,000 edits in mainspace and actively involved in keeping vandalism in check. I've used both Twinkle and Redwarn, and I believe rollback would help me being quicker. I've gone through H:RV and WP:RBK, and I'm confident in using the right responsibly. Thank you Ab207 (talk) 06:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Template editor