Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Architecture

Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Architecture (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 


Image sizes[edit]

As one of the editors stated: And please don't change them! I don't think architecture articles should are written for those who have the smallest possible screens. One size does not fit all. . I take that as a shocking affront to everybody with small screens. And to people with poor eyesight. Because they can not cope with the excessive image sizes this user prefers. We write for everybody, not for a select group, although that user states: This style may be great for the who read only on telephones, but it looks terrible on an I-pad or a Mac Book.

It is serious concern that I have. The Banner talk 14:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

What are you talking about? One of what editors? The mobile view ignores the standard image formatting anyway. Myself, I don't see why "people with poor eyesight ... can not cope with the excessive image sizes" if by "excessive" large is meant. Johnbod (talk) 14:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
here Ceoil (talk) 15:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
I have reverted your reinstatement of the excessive sizes. I am not 25 anymore, my eyesight is not that great so I have the zoom level at my PC at 170% to be able to read the text comfortably. Then you have really large pictures that push all text away. The Banner talk 20:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Seeing that it is already reverted, it seems that "others" are not relevant towards the chosen style that only fits the chosen few. Good to know. The Banner talk 20:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
I looked at the Bourges Cathedral article on iphone, ipad and windows desktop (with a small longer than its wide screen), logged in and out. In each instance the way it was was better, or the same. I'm not convinced your ill tempered claims are based on reality, while my real objection, noted in the edit summary, is that the scale you imposed makes the images so small as to be no real informative, educational value. Ceoil (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

200 West Street[edit]

This discussion may be of interest to the members of this WikiProject. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

To note this seems to be resolved. Ceoil (talk) 23:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

FAR notice[edit]

I have nominated Prince's Palace of Monaco for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Marble House RfC[edit]

This RfC may be of interest to the members of this WikiProject. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 July 20 § Henry Kulka images[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 July 20 § Henry Kulka images. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Prix Versailles for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prix Versailles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prix Versailles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. I am posting here in the hope that page watchers will be able to provide evidence on whether the award is notable or not. TSventon (talk) 22:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

FAC open for Harry F. Sinclair[edit]

There has been an FAC open for Harry F. Sinclair House] since 29 July, and a week later, I'd like to ask for some reviewers. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 02:16, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

re Lombard Bands[edit]

Respectfully suggest that these are not decorative but as originally designed were specific features that marked the site of wooden joists, the ends of which needed to be sited squarely and fully on the full width of the wall and as such the ends would be exposed to the elements and start rotting. The solution to this problem, adopted by masons was to construct individual extensions outwards of the stone work so that the ends are protected I can finds no reference to support this view M G Rogers Building Stones Consultant Rugby tel 01788 821869

Request of inputs[edit]

Greetings,

Hi, I'm User:Bookku a discussion about the sourced content is underway @ Talk:Minar-e-Pakistan#En masse public molestation and sexual violence against women. Your inputs are requested and awaited. Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias are for expanding information and knowledge' (talk) 18:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Pedimental sculptures, essential for high quality architecture in courthouses....[edit]

Very nice (IMO) new article Pedimental sculptures in Canada was immediately nominated for deletion. Please consider participating at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedimental sculptures in Canada. --Doncram (talk) 05:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)